top of page

The Luxury of Hunger

I’ve been spending a lot of time lately just listening and watching. Sometimes the most profound lessons don’t come from a book or a sermon, but from the people you never expected to meet. I've been wrestling with some thoughts on the difference between being comfortable and being truly alive...



We didn’t set out to build a hub for the homeless. We just opened the door to offer dignity and love—that rolled out in clothing, food, and embrace—and then our unexpected friends went and told everyone else where the water was.



Now, I find myself in a space where the dichotomy between the homed and the unhomed is being turned upside down. We often label the homed as sustained and the unhomed as needy. But the more I sit with my new friends, the more I see a terrifying freedom in the vulnerable that those of us shrouded in materialism simply do not have.



I keep thinking about the Rich Young Ruler. He came to Jesus with a flex. He had the merit, the status, and the slice of the “American pie” of his day. But when Jesus told him to lose everything to gain everything, he walked away. He wasn't a bad person; he was just too full to be hungry.



For those of us who have worked hard to achieve our success, the Gospel can feel cheap because it requires no merit. We are so used to earning our way that we’ve made achievement the only thing that offers a sense of qualification. If we can’t earn it, we don't trust it.



I’m not trying to prove a point; I’m simply reporting what I see happening every day. The homed often have the luxury of safety, which seems to lead to a disabling contentment. There are enough buffers to keep the Gospel at a comfortable distance; it’s optional.



But the hunger of the unhomed drives them toward a radical transformation that is a rarity among the sustained. By the sheer weight of their need, they are positioned to live out the ancient directive to come and buy without money. One group is protecting their merit, while the other—having no currency to offer—is simply showing up to the table. The unhomed receive the Gospel with an ease that is both beautiful and convicting.



When compassion walks with domination, it results in enablement—we set ourselves up as the solution and keep people dependent on our merit. But when compassion walks with liberty, it results in empowerment.



Jesus wasn’t advocating for bankruptcy for its own sake; He was advocating for hunger. I’m realizing that while our funding may come from those who have achieved, our spiritual fire is fueled by those who have nothing to give but their hands and their hearts. They aren't clients to be managed; they are the neighbors teaching me what it actually looks like to lose everything to gain the only thing that matters.



I don’t want to be a savior. I want to be a neighbor who recognizes that sometimes, the person I’m helping is the one who truly knows the way Home.







Comments


bottom of page